The Panel considered the report of the
Assistant Director – Wellbeing and Community Leadership, to
consider the updated Safeguarding Policy and Procedures.
Following a review of the Safeguarding Policy,
the Communities Manager provided the Panel with an overview of the
policy framework for the Council to fulfil its safeguarding
statutory responsibilities and to demonstrate competence and
compliance.
An outline of the changes was given, which
related to:
·
roles, responsibilities and reporting arrangements;
·
guidance on domestic abuse to reflect the implementation of the
Domestic Abuse Act 2021;
·
multi-agency working practices;
·
internal reporting and monitoring processes;
·
refreshed and updated web links; and
·
policy layout changes for ease of navigation.
The Communities Manager highlighted that:
- the policy framework was aligned
with other district councils in Lincolnshire to agreed county
multi-agency policy and practices.
- the framework had interdependencies
with other Council policies including complaints, recruitment and
selection, and whistleblowing.
- Safeguarding compliance was audited
both internally and externally.
Members considered the report and made the
following comments:
- Members noted point 5.6 of the
report and queried whether any financial implications existed
relating to training or potential liabilities.
- The Communities Manager confirmed
that a contribution was made to Safeguarding Boards which allowed
employees to access the Lincolnshire training for free. This point
would be updated within the report.
- Members questioned whether the
Council could prevent domestic abuse.
- The Communities Manager stated that
everyone had the responsibility to act. Whilst the council could
not always stop incidents, it had the mechanism to speak to
individuals to offer support and guidance, and ultimately
escalation to those authorities which could take enforcement
action. District Councils were involved
in the prevention of escalation and levels of risk were assessed in
order to apply the most appropriate course of action.
- Members asked if the policy was
county-wide.
- The Communities Manager confirmed
that whilst the policy had related to South Holland, it linked to
consistent county-wide, multiagency protocols.
- Members asked if safeguarding
information was shared with other professional bodies; and whether
access to/ sharing of systems would be in place.
- The Communities Manager stated that
the different elements of the policy had distinct information
sharing arrangements, for example, in relation to Domestic Abuse,
meetings were held with other agencies twice per week, and separate
information agreements were in place with the Vulnerable Adults
Panel. Whilst information sharing with professional bodies
occurred, this was limited to relevant personnel and required the
highest level of care. Consent also needed to be considered.
- Members stated that the policy was a
good piece of work and understandably extensive but suggested that
a precis be produced for ease of reference.
- The Communities Manager confirmed
that the following actions were planned upon formal adoption of the
policy update:
- briefing sessions for staff and
members, including within induction training for new/returning
elected members;
- crib sheets would be made available;
and
- the Safeguarding area of the
intranet would be refreshed.