34 Draft Treasury Management Policy and Treasury Management Strategy Statement, Minimum Revenue Provision Policy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy 2023/24
PDF 244 KB
To provide pre-decision
scrutiny to the strategy being proposed (report of the Deputy Chief
Executive (Corporate Development) & S151).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Consideration was given to the report of the
Deputy Chief Executive - Corporate Development which provided
pre-decision scrutiny to the strategy being proposed.
The Interim Treasury and
Investment Manager introduced the report which detailed the Draft
Treasury Management Policy and Strategy Statement for the 2023/24
financial year which would be included within the Budget Setting
Report submitted to Council for approval. As a treasury report,
scrutiny from the Governance and Audit Committee was required prior
to its submission to Cabinet and Council.
- Appendix A outlined
The Treasury Management Policy Statement 2023/24; and
- Appendix B detailed
the Draft Treasury Management Strategy Statement, Minimum Revenue
Provision Policy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy
2023/24.
The main points of the report
and appendices were outlined in a presentation to the Committee at
the meeting, which included:
- Reporting
requirements as set out by the CIPFA (Chartered Institute of Public
Finance and Accountancy) 2021 Prudential and Treasury Management
Codes;
- Treasury Management
Strategy for 2023/34;
- Training;
- Capital Prudential
Indicators 2022/23 to 2027/28 which included capital expenditure
and financing; and borrowing need ;
- Minimum Revenue
Provision (MRP) Policy Statement;
- Borrowing;
- Annual Investment
Strategy;
- Prudential
Indicators; and
- Treasury Management
Practice (TMP1) - Credit and Counterparty Risk
Management.
Members considered the report
and presentation and made the following comments:
- Members queried
whether the value/performance of assets were assessed, and a
discussion ensued which distinguished between assets, revenue and
capital spend.
- The Assistant
Director – Finance clarified that:
- performance of
council assets was the responsibility of respective Assistant
Directors;
- the £5m
borrowing requirement referred to at
point 2.2 of the report related to the Capital programme which
incorporated the longer-term financial view of an asset, whereas
the Revenue account covered the day to day running of a service,
such as stationery and salaries. Spending relating to the Capital
programme included the utilisation of working capital, grant
funding or borrowing;
- to support
communication of the services details, a budget book would be
produced alongside the budget papers and circulated to all members,
which presented the net operation cost for each asset function in a
granular format; and
- the purpose of the
Treasury Management Strategy was to provide a treasury management
function which captured cash movements within services and
identified any surplus or deficit.
- Regarding the
utilisation of reserves, Members asked if the lowest balance kept
in reserve, as a ‘safety net’, could be disclosed.
- The Interim Treasury
and Investment Manager responded that the figure would be
considered and decided by the Section 151 Officer as part of the
budget setting process.
- Members referred to
the Internal Drainage Board precept and asked whether the
‘without referendum’ increased Council Tax payment was
expected to revert to previous levels in future years.
- The Assistant
Director – Finance responded that the settlement announced on
19 December 2022 was the greater of 3 per cent or £5. It was
assumed that the current level would remain for 2024/25 but it was
not known what the levels would be after this date.