Consideration was given to the report of the
Assistant Director – Regulatory which sought final approval
of the Animal Welfare Licensing Policy following a period of
consultation.
The Public Protection Manager introduced the
policy:
·
The policy had been put out for consultation with key bodies and
placed on the Council’s website for six weeks, but no
responses had been received.
·
Therefore, the final policy presented was the same as the draft
with a few grammatical changes.
·
Once approved by the Committee, the policy would come into effect
immediately.
·
There was a recommendation for delegated authority to be given to
the Public Protection Manager, in consultation with the Portfolio
Holder and the Chair of the Licensing Committee, to make minor
detail and layout changes to the policy in between review
periods.
Members made the following comments:
- Members asked for an update as to
the progress of premises inspections since the last meeting of the
Committee.
- Officers confirmed that there was a
programme of inspections taking place on application and on
renewal. The policy would further formalise the process for
inspections and allow for inspections to also take place mid-term
and when complaints have been received.
- Members queried whether vets were
readily available to assist with inspections where required.
- Officers confirmed that there was
one vet who was committed to working with SHDC and within the last
nine months there had been no significant issues surrounding vet
availability for inspections.
- Members expressed concern about
goldfish in bags being given away as prizes at fairgrounds.
- Officers confirmed that this did not
fall within the scope of the Animal Welfare Licensing Policy, but
the Council could use its powers in other departments, such as
Communities and Assets, to impose conditions on any hires taking
place on council owned land to ensure this activity was not taking
place.
- Members were encouraged by the
progress in relation to inspections and vet attendance at
inspections.
- Members suggested further small
amendments to the wording of the policy to make it clearer.
- Members asked why animal grooming
establishments were not included as part of the policy.
o
Officers explained that there was no legal basis for the Council to
intervene in regard to these establishments and that this
responsibility sat with Trading Standards in terms of standards of
service provision and the RSPCA for animal
welfare.
§
Members wished to confirm their support for lobbying the local MP
in regard to animal grooming establishments being licenced.
AGREED:
- That Licensing Committee approve and
adopt the revised policy.
- That the Public Protection Manager
and Licensing Team Leader, in conjunction with the Portfolio Holder
and Chair of Licensing Committee, be authorised to make detail and
layout changes between policy reviews, to ensure that the policy
reflects legislative and statutory guidance changes, as well as
ensuring that it reflects any changing corporate standards and
accessibility requirements.