Venue: The informal meeting will be held virtually via Zoom and streamed live, via the following link: www.facebook.com/SouthHollandDCofficial/
Contact: Democratic Services 01775 764838
Link: View Facebook Livestream of the meeting
No. | Item |
---|---|
To sign as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on Wednesday 29 September 2021 (copy enclosed). Minutes: Consideration was given to the minutes of the meeting held on 29 September 2021.
DECISION: That the minutes be signed as a correct record, subject to Councillor Sneath’s attendance being recorded.
|
|
Declaration of Interests. Where a Councillor has a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest the Councillor must declare the interest to the meeting and leave the meeting without participating in any discussion or making a statement on the item, except where a Councillor is permitted to remain as a result of a grant of dispensation. Minutes: There were none.
|
|
Matters arising from the last minutes. Minutes: There were none.
|
|
Spalding Traffic Restriction Order Discussions relating to the Traffic Restriction Order in Spalding Town Centre. PC Craig Lockton from the Police will be in attendance to offer his thoughts and to answer Members questions. Minutes: Following a discussion at the last Forum meeting regarding the Traffic Restriction Order in place in Spalding Town Centre, PC Craig Lockton was in attendance to talk through the TRO, where he raised the following points:
· The order prohibited vehicles from entering the town centre between 10am and 4pm Monday to Friday but there were exceptions for emergency vehicles and delivery vehicles. · It was evident when Police had looked into the issue that many people were not following the order and when drivers had been stopped, the Police had been met with hostility and many excuses. · The sign was clearly displayed in Herring Lane and there was no excuse for drivers ignoring it. · Key findings from the Police’s investigation were that trope data was hard to come by and it was difficult to enforce the order due to other commitments.
The following points were raised by members of the Forum:
· There was strong debate surrounding the enforcement of the order – some wanted stronger enforcement while others wanted to remove the order entirely. Had a survey been done to understand the public’s opinion on how the issue should be approached? o The Chairman responded that the idea was something to propose to County Councillors to progress. It would be difficult to make the order only enforceable for 3 days a week
· The TRO should be enforced and needed to be sorted out. It may be useful to publish information about how many tickets had been given out to deter others - did the Police have that information available to give out? o PC Craig Lockton confirmed that the Fixed Penalty Notice was £90, and he would find out the number of tickets given out and give this information to Forum members outside of the meeting.
· Members had previously expressed concern to the Police and they confirmed that they would put a concerted effort into enforcing the TRO. The TRO needed to be enforced to protect pedestrians, cyclists, and people who were hard of hearing. There should be a sign earlier on the junction to encourage people to not drive through the town centre. It was noted that the parking charges at Broad Street car park were very reasonable and therefore there was no reason that drivers should be parking in the Town Centre. o PC Craig Lockton advised that there was an option available to install an automatic self-raising bollard linked to the CCTV facility in Boston and a similar one had been installed in Peterborough.
· It was a matter of safety and there were two sides to the argument. Was there any way of conducting a public consultation on the issue? o The Chairman advised that to override a TRO the County Council would have to carry out a public consultation. If an objection were to be received during the consultation, the County Council would have to go through a formal, costly process to override the order.
· Could Hall Place be turned into a car park with a high ... view the full minutes text for item 15. |
|
Draft Budget 2022/23 To consider the Spalding Special Expenses Draft Budget 2022/23 (report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Corporate Development) and S151 enclosed). Minutes: Consideration was given to the report of the Deputy Chief Executive (Corporate Development) and S151 which considered the Spalding Special Expenses Draft Budget 2022/23.
The Assistant Director – Finance introduced the report and noted the following key points:
The following points were raised by members of the Forum:
|
|
Town Centre Improvement Plan Update The Forum will receive a presentation from the Town Centre Improvement Plan Co-ordinator to update on the Town Centre Improvement Plan. Minutes: The Town Centre Improvement Plan Co-ordinator presented an update on the Town Centre Improvement Plan, highlighting the following points:
The following points were raised by Members of the Forum:
|
|
Any other items which the Chairman decides are urgent NOTE: No other business is permitted unless by reason of special circumstances, which shall be specified in the minutes, the Chairman is of the opinion that the item(s) should be considered as a matter of urgency. Minutes: There were none. |