Consideration was given to the report of the
Assistant Director Wellbeing and Community, which provided an
update on enforcement activity across the Council.
The Communities Manager introduced the report
with an overview which had included:
- that the policy had a wide range of
legislative powers and enforcement across council services which
included: Environmental Protection; Licensing; Food, Health and
Safety; Communities; Planning; Housing; and Building Control;
- confirmation of the incremental
enforcement approach which had been taken: compliance; advice and
warnings; appropriate and proportionate enforcement action;
- that a Corporate Enforcement Policy
update would be delivered to the next Policy Development Panel
meeting;
- that enforcement activity for
2020/2021 had been included in the report; and
- recommendations of the report had
been to provide quarterly updates.
The Panel considered the update and made the
following comments:
- Members stated that fly-tipping
reports had not been followed up. Known problem areas had existed
in the district, particularly near fast-food outlets on the A17,
where CCTV had been needed. Had there been a robust attempt to
improve?
- The Communities Manager requested
details of any specific incidents that had caused concern regarding
follow up. Evidence had been needed for action to have taken
place. There had been challenges around
the security of temporary cameras however advancements in
technology had provided a solution for their use in Q4. Proposals
had been developed which allowed specific fly-tipping incidents to
be dealt with through Fixed Penalty Notices rather than court
action.
- Members stated that improved
detection and enforcement needed to be considered. Resources had
been needed and included within council budgets. Where new
fast-food sites had been proposed, it was suggested that planning
conditions needed to consider the disposal of branded waste.
- Various points were made by members
around the culture of littering and fly-tipping. Prevention
measures, which included signage, had been successful in
neighbouring districts. Enforcement responsibilities had been
within the remit of local authorities and needed to be utilised
where necessary. Members thanked the Spalding Wombles volunteers
for their work in the district.
- Members commented that the early
presentation of waste had caused problems in the district and that
increased resources had been needed to deal with the issue.
- The Communities Manager responded
that action had been difficult where waste had been presented early
at communal collection points where individual identities had not
been clear. Warning letters had been sent to residents in the
vicinity of communal areas where no individual perpetrator had been
identified.
- Members asked whether the 81 fixed
penalty notices and the court fines issued had been paid?
- The Communities Manager stated that
court fine cases had been followed from issue date through to
payment and that fixed penalty fines had been individually tracked
and payment pursued. Payment status updates for the 81 Fixed
Penalty Notices issued had not been available as cases had
straddled different financial years. Performance data for Fixed
Penalty Notices issued for specified financial years could be
interrogated if required.
- Members queried why training had not
taken place to increase the number of qualified officers needed to
undertake animal establishment inspections.
- The question would be
referred to the relevant officer and the information circulated to
members of the Committee.
AGREED:
a)
That the content of the report be noted;
b)
That data within the report be provided to Members on a
quarterly basis as part of the Performance report; and
c)
That the comments be noted with the following
recommendations:
- action be taken to address issues
raised; and
- performance improvements to be
demonstrated in the following 6 monthly report; and
- that the policy be strengthened to
aid improvements.