Consideration was given to the
report of the Deputy Chief Executive – Corporate Development
(S151) which set out a summary of the current financial position
for the Council at the end of the first quarter of 2023/24 for
members consideration.
The Portfolio Holder for
Finance, Commercialisation, UKSPF and Levelling Up presented the
report and apologised for needing to consider the report at a
special meeting. This had unfortunately
been necessary due to resourcing challenges in PSPS Limited which
were in the process of being addressed through recent recruitment
processes.
The Portfolio Holder for
Finance, Commercialisation, UKSPF and Levelling Up advised that the
financial environment continued to be extremely volatile and
challenging. In response to this he
encouraged all Portfolio Holders to continue with their proactive
scrutiny and consideration of their budget areas.
Table 1 on page 11 of the report currently showed a general fund
revenue overspend of £353,000. This had mainly been due to the following
factors:
-
Homelessness pressures, the relevant Portfolio
Holder had been working hard on this with the service to mitigate
and address this.
-
There were some smaller service overspends where
continued focus was required.
-
The residual efficiency requirements of this year of
£331,000.
The
Portfolio Holder for Finance,
Commercialisation, UKSPF and Levelling Up advised that
those pressures had been partially offset by
an increase in investment income of £316,000, resulting in a
net pressure of £353,000 on the general fund. As it stood, if
the situation was not addressed, this would be a further impact on
the general fund reserves.
In
terms of the HRA revenue position as set out on pages 12/13 this
continued to be in a very positive position, with a budgeted
revenue surplus of circa £2 million per annum.
With regard to the capital position, the General Fund Capital
Programme was currently underspending and would be subject to
review.
In
terms of the HRA due to an acceleration in section 106
acquisitions, this programme has been significantly
increased. Looking to the longer term
on the HRA Capital Programme, the authority would need to consider
longer term funding opportunities as an alternative to direct use
of reserve.
With regard to treasury management, the Portfolio Holder
for Finance, Commercialisation, UKSPF and Levelling
Up advised that the authority continued to
manage the cash of the Council in accordance with the regulations,
focusing on security, liquidity and yield, with the current
investments set out on page 20 of the report.
The
final part of the Appendix attached to the report detailed the
current collection of Council Tax, business rates and sundry debts.
The authority continued to stay focused on this area in what were
difficult economic circumstances currently.
The
Portfolio Holder for Finance, Commercialisation, UKSPF and
Levelling Up advised that in summary, the
authority was in a challenging financial environment and would need
to work hard over the coming months with services to look at
opportunities for efficiency and innovation.
The following questions and
observations were raised:
- It was noted that it
was not good practice to be considering figures for June at the end
of September and a number of reports the authority relied on needed
to be brought forward quicker and earlier.
- It was observed that
the capital side was going to be able to accommodate what the
council wanted to do but revenue was a concern. Looking at what the authority was faced with it
was going to be difficult and the authority needed to be careful
how it moved forward. The authority was
fortunate regarding the windfall from the drainage board situation
and windfall from the interest accrued from investments was in
advance of what expected. It was perceived that the authority had
tended not to utilise those windfalls but to put them to one side
to offset when interest rates began to lower again and it was
questioned whether the authority should take more advantage of
those two windfalls?
- The Leader agreed
that the revenue issues meant a challenging time for councils all
over the country and the importance of financial management was
crucial, building into a medium-term financial plan going
forward. The authority would have to
make some difficult decisions. Savings
were needed and they were going to have to be quite
transformational. There was a need to
work smarter.
- The Portfolio Holder
for Communities and Operational Housing advised that she was very
confident that the Homelessness team was now working
better. There had previously been staff
retention issues and a reliance on agency staff. There were three
properties coming through via funding which would have a big
impact. The number of people in paid
temporary accommodation was in a different place because of the
improved and preventative ways of working. It was noted that in the lead up to winter there
was a need to be intelligence lead and continue to undertake
preventative work.
- The Leader advised
that the authority was lucky to receive a one-off payment via the
drainage board, however it remained a real issue going forward, and
the authority would continue to lobby. A Special Interest Group was
being proposed to try and make a difference.
- Clarification was
requested on the budget errors and the Head of Finance advised that
when the budget had been set some information wasn’t
available to be able to set accurate budgets and alongside this
every year the Government changed how it delivered grants. Going
forward there would be a full look at the budget process and the
Head of Finance gave the assurance that the errors would be
corrected and wouldn’t happen again. It was requested that an explanation of any errors
should be contained within the report – this was
noted.
- It was requested
whether any potential savings could be found in the Procurement and
Finance strategies as they were in the process of being finalised.
The Section 151 officer advised that the strategies were still
being looked at but gave assurance that as a partnership a tender
process had been followed and savings of a quarter of a million
pounds had been made. The authority was
also looking at other areas eg
insurances and were currently going through some preparatory work
for a tender which would potentially provide further
savings.
- In 2.5 of Appendix A
it stated that the capital programme had experienced an accelerated
spend and an explanation of this was requested. The S151 officer advised that due to the downturn
in the housing market the council was being approached more
regularly by developers to purchase S106 properties and the
authority were stepping into the market. This was good news for
Housing Revenue Account as it was accelerating the programme of
recovering from the authorities right to buy disposals, but it
meant that the authority was bringing some of that programme
forward. It was noted that the surge of
business had not been anticipated.
- The UK annuities bond
was listed as a long-term investment, and it was questioned as to
whether this was likely to give the authority any
returns. It was confirmed that a
watching brief would be kept on this investment.
- A question was asked
in relation to undertaking some work on the industrial units in
Crowland – it was advised that
this should be asked of the department who would provide a
response.
DECISION:
1)
That the report, current projected overspend of
£353,000, and the related detail set out in Appendix A be
noted.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
2)
To amend the Capital Programme to take into account
the changes set out in this report at Appendix A – Table 4
(General Fund) and Table 7 (HRA)
(Other options considered:
- To not approve the
reserve movements outlined.
Reasons for decision:
To
ensure the Council’s forecast financial position for 2023/24
is considered and related decisions approved. It is important that
the Cabinet are aware of the financial position of the General Fund
to ensure that they can make informed decisions that are affordable
and financially sustainable for the Council.)