Agenda item

Spalding Town Centre Security & CCTV update

Shop-Watch Representative, Stuart Brotherton to provide an update on Spalding Town Centre security and CCTV.

Minutes:

The Chairman introduced the Shop Watch representative Stuart Brotherton to present the Spalding Town Centre Security & CCTV update.

 

Stuart Brotherton introduced himself to the Forum and gave a brief outline of his credentials, and his current position as the Shop/Business Watch representative.

 

  • In the previous ten years the retail trading sector had suffered, struggling to compete with online trading, and many shops had closed.
  • Towns had seen a demise of up to twenty five percent of local businesses, pubs, and retail outlets.
  • It was promising that several businesses were reopening - The Ship Albion public house, along with new town centre shops.

 

The Business Watch scheme was a preventative scheme which carried out banning orders on individuals who committed crime in retail and public house premises.

 

  • Currently 28 shops and 13 pubs were members of the Business Watch scheme.
  • Members had radio links to Boston CCTV Centre, where radios were  monitored at no additional cost.
  • Although a professional operation, the Boston CCTV Centre had multiple cameras to monitor, and were currently at maximum capacity.

 

Although Stuart Brotherton explained he did not directly deal with the CCTV operation, he had ample experience in this field.

 

  • He informed the Forum that the elevated camera outside The Ivy Wall gave a panoramic view from Bentley’s to the traffic lights on New Road, making this a really valuable camera.
  • He suggested that an elevated camera in the Sheep Market would be able to cover all angles, rather than an eye level camera which would be restricted.
  • If an elevated camera was placed in a central position, it would give the maximum coverage of a 360-degree circular view.
  • Currently, Shop Watch had banned 28 individuals, some with lifetime bans for repeated offences. 
  • Local town pubs had less offenders, due to effective premises licence management.
  • Establishments that engaged full time security reported a significant  decrease in thefts.

 

Members asked Stuart Brotherton if he could advise on the issues the town was currently experiencing in the area outside Boots in Hall Place.

 

  • He informed the Forum, that along with local councillors, Spalding town centre shops/businesses were collaborating to assess how they could improve the situation.
  • Stuart Brotherton advised the Forum that he had recently written to the Home Secretary with regard to the changes that were required in Law and Order for a fair justice system.
  • 95% of shop thefts were committed by persons with drug and alcohol dependencies, not as a result of the cost-of-living crisis.
  • He urged the courts to scrutinise how they addressed and dealt with  entrenched alcohol and drug issues - dealing with these issues would be a solution to the majority of shop theft.
  • Change was required, specifically in relation to sentencing.

 

The  Forum thanked Stuart Brotherton for the excellent work.

 

The members raised the following points:

 

Councillor Sheard and Councillor Taylor informed the Forum that they had travelled to Boston to view the monitoring of the CCTV and presented back the following: 

 

  • At certain times the CCTV was monitored by only one person, covering all three council areas.
  • Often the officers were performing various other tasks/duties whist observing the security cameras.
  • Would recommend a larger space and a minimum of two persons at all times to monitor the surveillance system. 
  • Boston and Skegness, being larger towns took priority over Spalding.
  • It was suggested that additional officers to monitor the CCTV, who had an excellent knowledge of the local area, be employed.
  • It was recommended that all members should visit the Boston CCTV control room.

 

Stuart Brotherton agreed with members that the officers monitoring the CCTV were spread too thin and that in the past there would have been three to four people, some with a police background, monitoring the surveillance system.

 

The Portfolio Holder for Strategic Housing, Leisure Centre Delivery and Spalding Town Improvement informed the Forum that as CCTV fell under his Portfolio, he would provide an updated data report to future Forum meetings.

 

Members raised the following questions:

 

  • Did the public require advice on how to report incidents? 
    • Incidents should be reported to the SHDC Community Safety Team on the Council’s website or directly to the Police, giving the date, time, and as many details as possible. This would enable the police to gather evidence, make arrests and gain convictions.
    • The Street Safe app could be downloaded and used to report any incident, including Anti-Social Behaviour.

 

  • The Chairman asked what the cost of an elevated 360 camera above the Sheep Market toilets would be?
    • The Portfolio Holder for Strategic Housing, Leisure Centre Delivery and Spalding Town Improvement responded that he would investigate the cost and coverage and present back at the next Forum meeting.
    • It was noted that the current camera in the Sheep Market gave a restricted view.
    • A single elevated camera in the correct position would provide excellent footage of Station Street, Hall Place and The Crescent.
    • It was noted that CCTV cameras reduced crime and were multifunctional.
    • With the correctly positioned camera, CCTV footage would show who had entered the toilets, although it would still not show who had vandalised the inside of the toilets.

 

  • Would buskers need to be approved to perform in Spalding Town centre?
    • SHDC held an approved list for licenced buskers and anyone performing without a licence would be moved on.