Consideration was given to the report of the
Deputy Chief Executive (corporate Development and S151) which
considered the Draft Spalding Special Expenses budget for
2024/25
The Chief Finance Officer informed the Forum
that part of the 24/25 budget setting process would be to consult
with the Forum regarding the post budget and the level of council
tax that would be recommended to Cabinet for the coming financial
year.
- The papers contained the proposed
Special Expenses Budget setting for the current financial year
which was shown in appendix A.
- The aforementioned represented a
budget of £246.418 for 24/25, an increase of approximately
£5k over the current financial year, this equates to a
Council Tax Band D charge of £25.83 per Band D property, an
increase of £1.26 per annum, per property.
The Chief Finance Officer wanted to specify
that the level of council tax was governed by central
government.
- Central government limit the amount
of increase allowed to go through on the council tax charge,
equally taking into consideration SHDC B and D charge, therefore
the calculations showed that the £1.26 increase was the
maximum permission without incurring or breaching any referendum
limits.
The report in Appendix A details further
information regarding the budget.
- In essence it was a stand still
budget, with reflections of inflationary increases.
The Chief Finance Officer would be happy to
answer any questions.
The Chairman had previously convened with the
Chief Finance Officer, the Chairman briefed the Forum that although
the budget remained equivalent, any excess funds would be
transferred to the Spalding Special Reserves.
- The reserves had previously been
used to fund events, such as the King’s Coronation, subject
to Cabinet approval.
- The Chairman would like the Forum to
be aware of the reserve funds and how they could be utilised.
- The Spalding Special Expenses budget
was for the Forum to note and feedback any comments.
The Chairman informed the Forum that Spalding
Play Parks did not currently receive any funding in the budget, he
wished the Chief Finance Officer to note this when considering
future budget setting.
Members asked the following questions;
- Why had the budget for the Christmas
lights/decorations been reduced?
- The Chief Finance Officer explained
that compared to last year, the current electricity charges had
fallen along with reduced inflation costs, hence the decrease to
the Christmas lights budget.
- Could the brackets that had
previously been mounted on the sides of shop walls be utilised?
- Cllr J Le Sage informed the Forum
that in previous years brackets had been mounted on the sides of
walls in which small Christmas trees could be displayed. Some of
these existing brackets are still visible and could be reused for
tree decorations if funding was available.
The Chairman of the Forum made reference to
the quality of the lights being outmoded and essentially should be
replaced.
- It was deemed that various other
funding areas would be necessary to renew the town centre Christmas
lights and decorations.
- Funding could be available from
UKSPF, this would need to be explored along with other funding
opportunities.
The Portfolio Holder for Strategic Housing,
Leisure Centre Delivery and Town Centre Improvement referenced that
it was important to celebrate Christmas, to create a destination
experience, especially over the Community Christmas events.
- The vote for the BID (Business
Improvement District) takes place later in the year, which would
present business more freedom and finances to spend on Town Centre
events, which would include the Christmas Lights and
decorations.
The Forum had agreed that improvements needed
to be made.
The Forum noted the report.
The Chairman thanked the Chief Finance Officer
for their attendance.