Consideration was given to the report of the
Assistant Director – Leisure and Culture which provided the
Panel with an update on Q3 & Q4 performance for 2023/2024.
- The Leisure Services Officer
introduced the report and presented the following summary of
performance outcomes for the period:
- Usage of the Castle Sports Complex,
the Castle Swimming Pool, and the Peele Leisure Centre steadily
increased in Q3. The Castle Swimming Pool site reported an increase
in general swim, swimming lessons and school usage. The Castle
Sports Complex site reported higher usage in class attendance,
although gym usage reported a decrease. The Peele Leisure Centre
reported an overall increase in all areas compared to Q3 2022;
- In terms of sales, the Castle sites
reported mixed results in Q3. Gym membership sales were below
target for October but exceeded targets for November and
December;
- The Castle Pool sales varied month
on month;
- The Peele Leisure Centre
consistently exceeded all sales targets;
- In Q4, the leisure facilities
produced strong results with increased sales and usage overall.
Whilst the Castle Sports Complex experienced a decline in gym
visits, the Peele Leisure Centre experienced increased sales and
usage for gym and class visits; and
- Membership sales exceeded targets in
January, February and March 2024 at the Castle sites.
The Area Manager and Contract Manager of
Parkwood Leisure attended to deliver a presentation to the Panel
(appended to the minutes) which included an update on the following
areas over the last 12 months:
- Introduction and review of
2023/2024;
- Memberships – Health and
Fitness;
- Memberships – Swimming;
- Memberships – Swimming
Lessons;
- Usage;
- Marketing and Promotion;
- User feedback;
- Challenges;
- New site – opportunities and
challenges.
Members considered the Parkwood Leisure
presentation and raised the following questions:
- It was suggested that posters/flyers
be circulated to local community groups and libraries in Long
Sutton and the surrounding villages, as not all potential customers
engaged with social media.
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
responded that they did not exclusively advertise on social media
platforms and recently flyers had been inserted into all council
tax envelopes that were distributed to every resident across South
Holland District.
- Members queried the catchment area
of users of both sites.
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
responded that the membership system could provide a postcode
breakdown, which would be provided to the Panel.
- Members requested that the marketing
campaign for the Peele site be broadened to incorporate a wider
catchment area to increase the current usage levels. Did Parkwood
have targets to increase usage?
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
responded that:
§
This was dependent on what the usage was for, he explained the
sports hall remained booked throughout the week, but was quieter at
the weekends;
§
The gym had a steady flow of customers throughout their opening
times but would continue to maximise usage;
§
It was particularly difficult to increase memberships at the Peele
site, in reality the school site numbers decreased during Covid and
had not returned to previous levels. Increased membership numbers
and general usage was an ongoing challenge; and
§
The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure acknowledged
members’ comments and agreed, where applicable, to
extend leaflet drops to local community groups and libraries in
Long Sutton and the surrounding villages
- Members stated that they could
assist with advising of locations for leaflet drops and displays
and suggested that the inclusion of leisure facility marketing
leaflets in local parish magazines/newsletters distributed to
residents could be economically effective.
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
responded that:
§
Following a recent meeting with Parkwood
Leisure’s National Marketing Manager, it was acknowledged
that decisions relating to marketing activity and promotional spend
for the next 8 to 12 months were challenging. Clarity was
required from SHDC regarding the Gym and Group Exercise facility
provision when the Castle site closed for redevelopment - without
this the ability to market / promote such provision was
difficult.
- Members acknowledged the challenges
ahead and requested that the council confirm arrangements as soon
as these were known, enabling the contractor to inform the public
of available leisure options and signpost customers to the interim
site.
- Members queried when the contractor
for the new Health Hub would be announced. It would be beneficial
to award the contract to an operator sooner rather than later,
enabling marketing plans to be put into place and for SHDC to
support with a communications plan.
- The Assistant Director –
Leisure and Culture informed the Panel that the current contract
expired in March 2026, and that the tender for the new contract
would be announced shortly. In the interim, officers were currently
looking into available options off and on-site, to minimise
disruption for the Castle Sports Complex members.
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
added that:
- Parkwood Leisure were committed to
the contract however this now incorporated the pressing need to
communicate with current gym members regarding the move of the
service to an interim site from November 2024. The gym was a key
part of Parkwood’s business and the location of the interim
site was not yet known. Parkwood requested as much notice as
possible so that members could be informed and memberships
retained; and
§
It was important that the SHDC Levelling up website
“Delivering a new Health and Wellbeing Hub for all of
South Holland” was kept up to date. Sites had
banners/posters signposting customers to the hub website to keep
them updated and would also accommodate any other supporting
information SHDC supplied to assist staff and customer
communication.
- Members asked whether Facebook
advertisements and posts could be increased as this was a free form
of advertising and could be utilised in a more productive way.
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
responded that whilst Facebook posts were free, the advertising
element did incur a cost. Analysis of social media campaigns had
not evidenced a favourable outcome and the cost versus membership
gain was not viable.
- Members noted the higher than
national average usage increase at the SHDC leisure sites, and
queried if the reason for this was known
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
responded that the majority of the increment was attributed to an
increase of swim memberships and swimming lessons which has
continued to grow post-Covid. The Castle Swimming Pool would remain
open until the new Health Hub completed and communications around
this has helped with memberships.
- Members asked whether the increased
number of swim memberships and lessons had resulted from the
marketing campaign and advertising structure. Additional leaflet
drops were positive and had been well-received.
o
The Leisure Services Officer responded that although increased
leaflet drops were circulated with marketing material in the
Council Tax letters, it was difficult to track the outcomes and
actions from those leaflet drops. Parkwood Leisure would continue
to provide a varied range of marketing strategies; and
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
added that feedback was helpful and that suggestions would be taken
on board.
- Members asked whether Parkwood
Leisure had a view on the size of swimming pool for the new
facility. Would a 50-metre pool be beneficial in order to attract
competitions?
- The Area Manager - Parkwood Leisure
responded that:
§
In terms of competitive swimming, ‘short course’
swimming required 25-metre pools whilst ‘long course’
swimming required 50-metre pools. Certain depths were also required
for specific competitions. Consultants would have taken such
requirements into account when producing and submitting proposals
however the decision would ultimately be one for SHDC;
§
Should they be granted the new operator contract, Parkwood Leisure
would be happy to work with any size and space and to fulfil
contract requirements, such as running swimming competitions, in
accordance with the facilities provided;
§
Parkwood Leisure had provided input for the design of the new
facility and had welcomed the development of a new teaching pool;
and the 25-metre pool was a modern design which would be suitable
for short course competitions; and
§
A larger (50-metre) pool would not necessarily bring economic
benefits when considering the increased staffing and utility costs
against normal usage and potential competitions.
AGREED:
After consideration of the Swimming Pool and
Leisure Facilities Task Group update:
a)
That the Quarter 3 and 4 2023/24 performance outcomes be noted;
and
b)
That the comments of the Panel be noted.