Consideration was given to the
report of the Assistant Director – Housing which provided an
update on progress made towards meeting the outcomes of the Social
Housing (Regulation) Act 2023 including revised consumer
standards.
The Portfolio Holder for
Strategic and Operational Housing presented the report, and the
following issues were raised:
·
Should an inspection of SHDC’s housing stock
take place presently, what grading could the Authority hope to
achieve?
- The Portfolio Holder
for Strategic and Operational Housing responded that this was
currently hard to answer. So far, there
had only been a small number of Regulatory Judgements at other
councils however, each one was being monitored by the
Authority. Details of the gradings
(C1-C4) were detailed within section 2.2 of the report. Those councils that had been graded at C2
generally had good control of their council stock, a good
understanding and delivery of the consumer standards, and good
health and safety provision. Those
councils with a C3 grading seemed to have concerns around health
and safety. With regard to the issue of
health and safety and SHDC housing stock, compliance clinics were
being held monthly, providing a great deal of assurance and
scrutiny, and there was also a robust testing of data being
undertaken. The Portfolio Holder was
confident that sufficient consideration was being given to the
health and safety element and achieving the required
standards.
·
It appeared that more responsibility on housing
issues was being placed on members – was this the
case?
- The Portfolio Holder
for Strategic and Operational Housing responded that although there
was an emphasis for members to have more responsibility, the
regulator’s view was that the governing body i.e. the Cabinet
be kept fully informed, hence the number of reports at this meeting
and in the future. It was important to
ensure that everyone was kept very well informed on the issues and
progress. In addition, individual
members had responsibility for individual areas – as an
example, the Portfolio Holder advised that she had responsibility
for complaints.
·
With regard to the issue of damp, condensation and
mould, to what extent was the Council responsible for what could be
perceived as ‘lifestyle’ factors (such as drying
washing indoors and not heating the home) that could contribute to
these problems? Were any measures being
taken to mitigate this?
- The Portfolio Holder
for Strategic and Operational Housing responded that, following
Awaab’s Law, it was an important
cultural change to move away from considering problems being as a
result of ‘lifestyle’ issues. In the past, this had been the typical response of
councils and landlords. There has been a shift in the
Authority’s approach, and speedy assessments of houses are
being undertaken. There could be
occasions where advice needed to be given to tenants in order to
improve the situation within their home however, it was important
to also look at a property on its own merit and make a decision
based on that information as to what improvements could be
undertaken.
DECISION:
That the work underway to align
services with the new regulatory regime, and the Council’s
progress towards delivering the outcomes of the consumer standards
be noted.
(Other options considered:
·
Do nothing – to retain progress
updates through operational arrangements with the Portfolio Holder
for Strategic and Operational Housing.
This option was not considered to be appropriate as the Regulator
of Social Housing was clear that Councillors were responsible for
ensuring that the Council, in its role as a registered provider,
was meeting the regulatory standards
set.
Reasons for decision:
·
To provide assurance to Cabinet on the
Council’s preparations for regulatory inspection and provide
updated information on ongoing work towards meeting the outcomes of
the consumer standards).