Consideration was given to the report of the
Assistant Director – Communities and Housing Services which
provided Members with an update on the South Holland Centre.
The Group Manager – Community Leadership
introduced the report and highlighted the following points:
- The report updated on activity
undertaken in Q1 and Q2 and provided a positive forecast.
- Ticket sales were at almost 14,000,
which was higher than the same period last year which had been
drive by strong live performances and increased community
hires.
- The 2025 Pantomime, Rapunzel, had
sold over 10,500 tickets, with further ticket sales expected
throughout December.
- The team were continuing to look at
income generation opportunities and the relaunch of the wedding
offer would take place in January.
- Decoration and lighting enhancement
would take place while the centre was closed in January, in
addition to the maintenance programme already completed in Q1 and
Q2.
- Conversations had recently taken
place to source funding for a replacement projector for film.
Members considered the report and made the
following comments:
- Who was currently providing the
hospitality offer at the SHC?
- The Assistant Director –
Communities and Housing Services confirmed that The Red Lion in
Spalding were currently providing this service.
- The Group Manager – Community
Leadership added that this arrangement had been working really well
and was a reliable service for visitors to the SHC.
- What service did The Red Lion
provide?
- The Group Manager – Community
Leadership responded that they provided snacks, and the bar offer
for all performances.
- The Assistant Director –
Communities and Housing Services added that there was an
opportunity for merchandise to be sold at some showings. There had
been some difficulty with food providers at the venue previously,
so care was needed with taking any steps to reintroduce this
offer.
- What sort of merchandising was being
looked at?
- The Portfolio Holder for Assets and
Strategic Planning responded that this was being discussed as part
of the redecoration of the foyer in January, with snacks and
popcorn likely being provided in this area of the centre.
- The choice of caterer for hirers of
the function hall was a benefit as they were not restricted to one
choice of caterer.
- Were there plans in place for use of
other spaces within the SHC?
- The Group Manager – Community
Leadership responded that options had been looked at for exercise
classes in the basement rooms, but this had not been viable.
- The team were working with Assets to
look at progressing available options and the function hall had a
recent enquiry for hire of the venue twice a week.
- The Portfolio Holder for Assets and
Strategic Planning added that opportunities were coming forward to
the Assets team every once in a while that were being
explored.
- Had work been undertaken in
partnership with the Spalding Town Centre redevelopment project?
- The Group Manager – Community
Leadership confirmed that a meeting would be happening soon to
progress this further.
- The Assistant Director –
Communities and Housing Services added that the redevelopment plans
presented had shown that the public saw the SHC as an anchoring
part of the town centre.
- Had the costs recharged to other
departments been looked into?
- The Assistant Director –
Communities and Housing Services responded that recharges to PSPS
were reviewed annually as part of the budget setting process, but
these costs were standard across all Council departments.
- The SHC team had worked really had
to bring income into the service and reduce the overheads.
- It was recognised that the cost to
SHDC for the SHC was worthwhile, given its key place in the town
centre.
- Were there barriers to interested
parties hiring the SHC more than once a week?
- The Assistant Director –
Communities and Housing Services noted that this was not a message
that had been received from hirers and individual cases could be
discussed outside of the meeting.
- Having a fixed programme in place
helped to ensure that a broad range of performances were on offer
as too many repeats of the same type of performance would affect
ticket sales.
- Had programming for films changed?
- The Group Manager – Community
Leadership responded that films were generally programmed for when
the centre was open for other functions and events, unless it was a
high profile film.
- Did the SHC still receive Arts
Council funding? The criteria for this had previously been quite
strict and the programmed shows had often been poorly attended.
- The Assistant
Director – Communities and Housing Services confirmed that
funding had been received in previous years , but no direct funding
recently. There was always a set of criteria with any
funding, but the team made the best use of any funding available to
them.
- The Group Manager
– Community Leadership added that they were working closely
with the NPO to direct the future funding opportunities to the best
use within the SHC’s programme.
- The Assistant Director –
Communities and Housing Services commented that the large scale
service review over the summer had brought in fresh eyes to the SHC
and new approaches could be developed.
- What was the status of the projector
currently being used to show film?
- The Group Manager
– Community Leadership confirmed that conversations were
progressing to source funding for a replacement
projector
- It was noted that the noise from any
events in the function hall would impair the enjoyment of those in
the auditorium below.
- Had there been any impact on ticket
sales at the SHC following the incorrect signage being displayed
regarding the TRO?
- The Portfolio Holder for Assets and
Strategic Planning responded that some concerns had been expressed
by visitors when the signage had first been installed but the
impact on ticket sales had not been looked into.
- The Assistant Director –
Communities and Housing Services added that the parking was part of
the experience of those attending the SHC and opportunities for new
conversations about parking had arisen through the new
neighbourhood plan for Spalding.
AGREED:
That the contents of the report be noted.