Consideration was given to the report of the
Assistant Director – Regulatory which asked that members
review the Partnership Environment Policy one year from its
adoption.
The Assistant Director – Regulatory
introduced the report and highlighted the following key points:
- The Partnership Environment Policy
provided the overarching framework for delivering environmental
priorities set out in the Partnership Sub-regional Strategy
(2024–2029).
- The policy sought to balance
sustainability with economic and social considerations and
demonstrated the Council’s commitment to environmental
leadership.
- Four key themes underpinned the
policy:
- Protecting and recovering the
natural environment.
- Mitigating and adapting to climate
change.
- Protecting and enhancing the built
environment.
- Ensuring sustainable waste and
resource management.
- Since adoption, the policy had
shaped several strategies and plans, including the Sustainable
Products Policy, Tree and Hedgerow Strategy, and the Carbon
Reduction Plans.
- A Climate Change and Environment
Impact Assessment tool had been introduced to evaluate
environmental impacts consistently as part of the
decision-making.
- Performance monitoring was achieved
through the Partnership’s Annual Delivery Plan and the South
and East Lincolnshire Climate Action Network (SELCAN).
- The Assistant Director - Regulatory
explained that the policy remained fit for purpose and proposed
that the next review should take place in 2028/29 to align with the
Sub-regional Strategy.
Members considered the report and made the
following comments:
- Members asked if the partnership was
achieving everything that the policy had set out.
- The Assistant Director - Regulatory
confirmed that the delivery of actions aligned with the
policy’s principles and that progress was being made through
associated strategies and plans.
- Members expressed concern that
recycling waste rates appeared to have fallen over the past year.
How did this policy influence waste and recycling performance.
- The Assistant Director - Regulatory
explained that recycling performance was largely driven by national
policy, which the Council had limited influence over. However,
local waste collection policies and service improvements were
influenced by the Environment Policy. Planned changes, such as how
food waste would be collected, would support improvements over
time.
- Members noted that the policy had
been in place for a year, yet recycling rates remained low. Did
this mean that the policy was ineffective.
- The Assistant Director - Regulatory
noted that the policy had set long-term strategic goals, and
changes to waste regimes required significant investment and time.
The policy provided the framework for decisions, but measurable
improvements in recycling would take time to materialise.
- Members asked whether there was a
risk that the policy was just a high-level document without real
impact.
- The Assistant Director - Regulatory
acknowledged the concern but emphasised that the policy supported
operational strategies and projects. It was not intended to deliver
immediate results but to guide sustainable decision-making across
all services.
- Members asked why the next review
was scheduled for 2028/29, and should the Policy be brought back to
the Panel before this.
- The Assistant Director - Regulatory
explained that the review date aligned with the Sub-regional
Strategy to ensure consistency between strategic documents.
Bringing the policy back earlier would likely result in the same
discussion, as changes would take time to implement.
- Members wanted assurance that the
policy was committed to minimising single-use items.
- The Assistant Director - Regulatory
agreed this was a valid point and noted that the Sustainable
Products Policy, which sat under the Environment Policy, was
driving changes in purchasing behaviour. However, changes across
the partnership would take time to implement.
- Members asked how progress on
reducing single-use products and paper usage was measured.
- The Assistant Director - Regulatory
confirmed that audit work on purchasing behaviours was ongoing and
that data would be provided at a future meeting when the
Sustainable Products Policy was next due on the review cycle.
Councillor Mark Le
sage left the meeting at 8.26pm.
AGREED:
1)
That the content of the report be noted.
2)
That following consideration an update on the Environmental Policy
would be provided for review in 2028/29.
Councillor Jan
Whitbourn left the meeting at
8.28pm
Councillor D Ashby
left the meeting at 8.29pm