Consideration was given to the presentation of
the Business Change and Intelligence Manger who asked the members
to review the Artificial Intelligence Policy one year from its
adoption at Cabinet.
The Business Change and Intelligence Manger
highlighted that:
- An AI Working Group had been
established to oversee initiatives, share best practices, and
ensure responsible deployment. Governance was supported by the ICT
Strategy Board, which reviewed business cases for new AI
applications.
- Regular briefings, workshops, and
staff communications had been delivered to promote awareness and
encourage the adoption of AI.
- AI tools were being used to align
policies across the partnership and to perform impact assessments
more efficiently.
- AI had assisted with triaging
complaints, which in turn reduced delays and improved
accuracy.
- AI supported officers with sourcing
data and evidence.
- AI transcription and summarisation
tools were being used to assist with the production of draft
minutes and analyse trends.
- The Transformation Team was leading
the partnerships AI adoption, ICT ensured secure deployment and
integration; and Data Protection teams monitored compliance with
GDPR.
- Further exploration of Microsoft
Copilot would enable further
development of methodologies to quantify efficiency gains and
potential financial savings.
Members considered the update and made the
following comments:
- Members asked how secure AI was when
drafting policies or processing sensitive information.
- The Business Change and Intelligence
Manager clarified that Copilot operated
within the Microsoft 365 environment, which was as secure as SHDC
emails and document systems. Public AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini were blocked for
officers;
- The
Business Change and Intelligence Manager would confirm if this
applied to Members.
- Members asked if Copilot could be automatically installed on
members’ devices.
- The
Business Change and Intelligence Manager agreed this would be ideal
and would check with ICT and would report back to the members if
this could be arranged.
- Members questioned if it was safe to
use ChatGPT on their Council iPads for
tasks like risk assessments.
- The Business Change and Intelligence
Manager responded that members should avoid entering personal or
sensitive data into ChatGPT.
Copilot was recommended for
work-related tasks as it was secure and integrated with Council
systems.
- The
Business Change and Intelligence Manager would confirm the official
position on ChatGPT access for
members.
- Members discussed how accuracy was
ensured when AI produced outputs such as risk assessments or social
media posts.
- The Business Change and Intelligence
Manager explained that AI was an assistant, not an autonomous
decision-maker. All outputs must be reviewed and signed off by a
human officer with subject expertise. SHDC was not currently using
AI for automated decision-making.
- Members suggested that if officers
were required to check everything that AI produced, would this not
duplicate work.
- The Business Change and Intelligence
Manager reiterated that AI would reduce background work and speed
up processes, but human oversight would remain essential to
maintain quality and compliance.
- Members asked how we ensured
transparency when AI-generated content was published externally.
- The Business Change and Intelligence
Manager answered that disclaimers for AI-generated content were
under consideration and would be implemented for any material
published externally.
- It was suggested that members would
like to receive training and a demonstration on AI tools like
Copilot.
- The
Business Change and Intelligence Manager confirmed that ICT had
delivered staff training sessions and would check whether similar
training could be arranged for members.
- Members asked how AI use was being
monitored across the partnership services.
- The Business Change and Intelligence
Manager confirmed that an AI Use Case Register was being maintained
by the working group, which captured all areas where AI was
currently deployed and ensured data protection impact assessments
were completed where necessary.
AGREED:
That following the
presentation of the Artificial Intelligence Policy the Panels
comments would be noted.